fix: live-fetched portal models route through configured provider — v0.50.153 (closes #854)
_fetchLiveModels() applies @provider: prefix to model IDs from portal providers.
This commit is contained in:
91
tests/test_issue854_live_model_prefix.py
Normal file
91
tests/test_issue854_live_model_prefix.py
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
|
||||
"""Regression tests for #854 — live-fetched models must route through the
|
||||
configured portal provider, not OpenRouter."""
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import re
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_SRC = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "..")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _read(name):
|
||||
return open(os.path.join(_SRC, name), encoding="utf-8").read()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLiveModelPrefix:
|
||||
"""_fetchLiveModels() must apply @provider: prefix to live-fetched model
|
||||
IDs when the fetch is for the active portal provider (Nous, OpenCode,
|
||||
etc.) — including IDs that already contain a slash (the upstream vendor
|
||||
namespace), since those would otherwise be mis-routed via OpenRouter."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_apply_prefix_to_any_non_at_id(self):
|
||||
"""The prefix check must not gate on `!mid.includes('/')`. The bug
|
||||
scenario in #854 is precisely about slash-prefixed IDs like
|
||||
`minimax/minimax-m2.7` from Nous's live catalog — excluding them
|
||||
leaves the bug unfixed."""
|
||||
js = _read("static/ui.js")
|
||||
m = re.search(r'async function _fetchLiveModels\(.*?\n\}', js, re.DOTALL)
|
||||
assert m, "_fetchLiveModels not found"
|
||||
fn = m.group(0)
|
||||
# The prefix application block must NOT have `!mid.includes('/')`
|
||||
# as a guard — slash-prefixed IDs from portal providers also need
|
||||
# the prefix.
|
||||
prefix_block = re.search(
|
||||
r"if\s*\(\s*[^)]*!mid\.startsWith\(['\"]@['\"]\)[^)]*\)\s*\{\s*mid\s*=\s*`@",
|
||||
fn,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert prefix_block, "@provider: prefix application not found"
|
||||
# The block must prefix when portal-fetch is true and not already @-prefixed.
|
||||
# It must NOT check for slash presence — that's the bug.
|
||||
assert "!mid.includes('/')" not in prefix_block.group(0), (
|
||||
"The prefix application must NOT exclude slash-prefixed IDs — "
|
||||
"portal catalogs return `minimax/minimax-m2.7` and similar that "
|
||||
"need `@nous:` prefix to route through the configured portal (#854)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_portal_fetch_flag_semantics(self):
|
||||
"""The flag controlling prefix application should be named/structured
|
||||
so the prefix is ADDED when the flag is true (portal fetch), not when
|
||||
false. Earlier revision used `!_needsPrefix` (inverted)."""
|
||||
js = _read("static/ui.js")
|
||||
m = re.search(r'async function _fetchLiveModels\(.*?\n\}', js, re.DOTALL)
|
||||
assert m
|
||||
fn = m.group(0)
|
||||
# New flag: _isPortalFetch (positive semantics)
|
||||
assert "_isPortalFetch" in fn, (
|
||||
"flag should be named _isPortalFetch to reflect positive semantics "
|
||||
"(prefix ADDED when true, not when false)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
# And the prefix application should be guarded BY the flag (not by its negation)
|
||||
gate = re.search(
|
||||
r"if\s*\(\s*_isPortalFetch\s*&&\s*!mid\.startsWith",
|
||||
fn,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert gate, "prefix application must be guarded by _isPortalFetch (true ⇒ prefix)"
|
||||
|
||||
def test_portal_fetch_excludes_openrouter_and_custom(self):
|
||||
"""OpenRouter IDs are cross-namespace by design, and `custom` providers
|
||||
use user-defined bare names — neither should get a `@provider:` prefix."""
|
||||
js = _read("static/ui.js")
|
||||
m = re.search(r'async function _fetchLiveModels\(.*?\n\}', js, re.DOTALL)
|
||||
assert m
|
||||
fn = m.group(0)
|
||||
assert "_ap!=='openrouter'" in fn or "_ap !== 'openrouter'" in fn, (
|
||||
"portal flag must exclude openrouter"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert "_ap!=='custom'" in fn or "_ap !== 'custom'" in fn, (
|
||||
"portal flag must exclude custom"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestCheckProviderMismatchAtPrefix:
|
||||
"""_checkProviderMismatch() must not warn on `@provider:`-prefixed IDs —
|
||||
the prefix itself is an explicit provider hint, so there's no mismatch."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_returns_null_for_at_prefix_ids(self):
|
||||
js = _read("static/ui.js")
|
||||
m = re.search(r'function _checkProviderMismatch\(.*?\n\}', js, re.DOTALL)
|
||||
assert m, "_checkProviderMismatch not found"
|
||||
fn = m.group(0)
|
||||
assert "modelId.startsWith('@')" in fn or 'modelId.startsWith("@")' in fn, (
|
||||
"_checkProviderMismatch must return null early for @provider: prefixed IDs"
|
||||
)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user